Free dirty chat room on my cell phone
Why do research articles on the health effects of secondhand smoke reach different conclusions?Well, turns out studies funded by the tobacco industry had a whopping 88 times the odds of concluding it was not harmful; so, ten or so times for telecom puts it more towards the drug industry end of the bias spectrum.You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that restrict others from doing anything permitted here.case study At HPE Discover, the enterprise IT company's premier event, presenters deploy polls to launch into their next topic, gather valuable insights from the audience, and engage 10,000 attendees in an ongoing conversation about the future of IT.So, they ran the numbers and surprise, surprise, found that the studies funded exclusively by industry were indeed substantially less likely to report significant effects.Most of the independently funded studies showed an effect; most of the industry-funded studies did not—in fact, had about ten times lower odds of finding an adverse effect from cell phone use. Studies sponsored by Big Pharma about their own products only had about four times the odds of favoring the drug, compared to independent researchers, though Big Tobacco still reigns supreme when it comes to Big Bias.Yeah, but a lot of those studies were in petri dishes or lab animals.I’m less interested in whether Mickey or Minnie are at risk; what about brain tumors in people?
Hmm, I wonder if the source of funding of those studies had anything to do with it.
Looking from the back of someone’s head or from the top, you can see why you might develop cancer on the one side of your head, over the other.